Supercritical CO2 Extraction: Unlocking Sustainable Innovation in Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry
The goal of green chemistry is to design products and processes that reduce or eliminate the use or generation of hazardous substances. The concept applies across the whole lifecycle of a chemical product, from design to disposal. To determine whether a product or process has a green chemistry foundation, we can measure it against the 12 principles of green chemistry. Supercritical CO2 extraction aligns well with these principles, particularly in its ability to minimize waste and reduce the use of hazardous substances. This method prevents waste by utilizing CO2, a byproduct of industrial processes, effectively turning potential environmental liability into a valuable resource. Furthermore, it also maximizes atom economy by ensuring that most of the extracted solutes are directly used, with minimal to no byproduct formation.
Supercritical CO2 – An Ecofriendly Extraction Method
Supercritical fluids, substances above their critical temperature and pressure, combine liquid-like solvent power with gas-like diffusivity and low viscosity, making them highly effective solvents for extraction and material processing. Their most notable uses include environmentally friendly extraction methods in the food and pharmaceutical industries due to their efficiency, ability to leave no residue, and adjustable solvent properties. Supercritical CO2 is of particular interest in green chemistry because it is non-flammable, relatively non-toxic and relatively inert. Additionally, its supercritical regime is easily accessible, with a critical temperature of only 304K, contributing to increased energy efficiency. For these reasons, supercritical CO2 is considered safer than traditional extraction methods that rely on more hazardous chemicals such as hexane and benzene.
Supercritical CO2 comes from a renewable feedstock—carbon dioxide from the atmosphere—making it a sustainable choice. The technique requires no chemical derivatives, further reducing waste and eliminating the need for additional reagents. As a catalyst, CO2 can be reused in the system, minimizing the need for stoichiometric reagents. Additionally, products extracted using this method are pure, negating the need for extensive downstream processing, which aligns with the principle of designing chemicals and products to degrade after use.
In the evolving landscape of green chemistry, the principle of infinite recyclability is emerging as a key player. It’s a concept that pushes the boundaries of sustainability, aiming to endlessly reuse materials without diminishing their quality. In addition to reducing waste and conserving resources, infinite recyclability is also about creating economic opportunities through savings and more stable supply chains. It embodies the circular economy ethos, where the lifecycle of materials is extended as much as possible, benefiting both the environment and the economy.
Green Economics and the Circular Economy
Supercritical CO2 has tremendous economic benefits. A study on the use of a multiproduct and mobile supercritical CO2 extraction plant found that the closed cycle process allowed for 99% CO2 recovery. Furthermore, the system was able to process a variety of feedstocks, and showed an internal rate of return of 40% and a payback time of 2.5 years.
The advantages go beyond economics, to efficiency, where supercritical CO2 has been shown to produce higher extraction recovery rates. It also eliminates the risk of chemical residue in the final product, which is crucial in processes where high purity is required. These advantages feed into the increased interest in the circular economy over the last 10 years. The aim is to encourage the adoption of closing-the-loop production methods to improve resource use efficiency, modify chemical processes, and increase product and material lifespan. Supercritical CO2 is an ideally suited reagent to meet these ambitious objectives.
The potential application of supercritical CO2 extraction to critical minerals recovery has been the subject of recent analysis, which highlighted the importance of controlling critical factors, as well as the use of modifiers and chelating agents to improve extraction efficiency. This is especially important given recent climate legislation that has been passed around the world. Most notable in the United States is the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which contains several sections focussed on climate change mitigation and domestic critical mineral supply chains.
For example, battery manufacturers have a strong commercial incentive in the form of tax credits to purchase North American source graphite. Under the IRA, a minimum of 50% of battery materials must be sourced in North America, and less than 1% can be sourced from China. Materials recovered from recycled EV batteries qualify as North America sourced, and the use of supercritical CO2 extraction to produce these materials makes economic, process, and environmental sense.
The Future of Supercritical CO2 Extraction
Supercritical CO2 extraction represents a significant advancement in the application of green chemistry principles, offering a safer, more efficient alternative to traditional chemical extraction methods. Its ability to reduce waste, lower the risk of chemical residues, and improve energy efficiency aligns with the goals of reducing environmental impact and enhancing sustainability. The economic benefits, such as high recovery rates and cost savings, alongside the promotion of a circular economy, further validate its importance.
Recent legislation, like the Inflation Reduction Act, underscores the growing demand for sustainable practices and the critical role of technologies like supercritical CO2 extraction in meeting these requirements. As industries adapt to these new standards, supercritical CO2 extraction stands out as a key technology for a sustainable future, emphasizing the need for continued innovation and adoption of green chemistry principles.
James White PhD and Joseph Moniodis PhD | 20th March 2024
Citation: James White and Joseph Moniodis. 2024. “Supercritical CO2 Extraction: Unlocking Sustainable Innovation In Green Chemistry.” Carbon Critical. https://carbon-critical.com/supercritical-co2-extraction/.
References
Beckman, Eric J. 2003. “Supercritical and near-critical CO2 in green chemical synthesis and processing.” Journal of Supercritical Fluids 28:121-191. https://archive.epa.gov/ncer/science/tse/web/pdf/sos.pdf.
Khalati, Elham, Pekka Oinas, and Leena Faven. 2023. “Techno-economic and safety assessment of supercritical CO2 extraction of essential oils and extracts.” Journal of CO2 Utilization 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102547.
Memon, Abdul Hakeem, Mohammad S. Hamil, Madeeha Laghari, Fahim Rithwan, Salman Zhari, Mohammad A. Saeed, Zhari Ismail, and Amin M. Majid. 2016. “A comparative study of conventional and supercritical fluid extraction methods for the recovery of secondary metabolites from Syzygium campanulatum Korth.” Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 17 (9): 683-691.
Ncube, Amos, Sandile Mtetwa, Makah Bukhari, Gabriella Fiorentino, and Renato Pessaro. 2023. “Circular Economy and Green Chemistry: The Need for Radical Innovative Approaches in the Design for New Products.” Energies 16 (4): 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041752.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2024. “Basics of Green Chemistry | US EPA.” Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/basics-green-chemistry.
Wu, Fenghui, Xinxin Liu, and Guangfei Qu. 2022. “High value-added resource utilization of solid waste: Review of prospects for supercritical CO2 extraction of valuable metals.” Journal of Cleaner Production 372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133813.